07/23/2025 — Reconciling the Inconsistancies of a Teaching
P___ is asking about Consistency, Coherence, and Consilience (related concepts that describe the interconnectedness and logical structure of information or systems).
This is not possible except in theory on the physical plane. In the sense this artisan wishes, the instruments of translation are insufficient. There is great beauty in the contradictions and elaborations of this or any teaching and reconciling them is excellent work in growth. We speak of the “next wave” very obliquely at this point as the probabilities still shift precariously beneath our metaphorical feet. Teachings will become more based in visual apprehension, that is to say images that evoke more of the emotional response than that of direct thought…
Reading, thought, they can convey emotion.
Yes, of course, but the response – the immediate response to stimuli is routed on different neural pathways. Visual sources evoke myriad small emotions that must then be transformed into thought. Words alone, text, routes directly into the intellectual core and is then interpreted out. Sexual dimorphism plays into this as well as overleaves and imprinting. We explained this as the reason to develop emotional center, with its natural function of gathering impressions, as the most efficient way to do intuitive work. Yes, you are correct, this also invokes a path to Balance in a very intellectually centered student cadre.
So “no” to Phil’s question?
He is aware this is not achievable. At best, you may find congruity in development of teachings, appropriate to cultural context and awareness. But waves of teaching evolve in the spiral of creation, and each embeds as necessary relative to the influences of the High Mental Body manifest in the linear time frame.
Does the next wave, Emotional and Energetic, come with an emerging Infinite Soul?
The influence of the operative infinite soul presages any appearance. However, yes you are seeing the Collectivist Worldview which is the Mature Soul World we spoke of. The Digital world is very much required to support such an event (undergirds?) and currently rides the deconstruction of the young soul world as it awaits genuine evolvement.
So this will be “Imagination/Intuition/Inspiration”. Coherence won’t apply?
Coherence = Tao. Anything else is relative to the viewer.
12/20/2022 — You Create What You Believe?
[I had been dealing with the frustrations of a body that was just a mess. Another student and I had been discussing this and I found a comment that was made to be irritating — unusual for me. So the next day I asked for guidance.]
K.: This irritation I had about ___ repeating “you create what you believe” like it was an answer of some kind. I cannot pull it apart.
Answer: Simply put, it is the same as saying “Om” or “All is one”. It is a true glance at the nature of Reality, of Unity. It is however without merit standing on its own without qualification. For instance, no matter how strong one’s will and belief is set on an immortal body, this will not happen in third density. Nor will an omniscient mind or a heart that is truly agape filled. This density does not contain the energy required to convert such a statement. You can see what we suggest about “qualification”.
K. Can you elaborate?
Answer: We will discuss your quandary. No creature of reason willingly creates pain for itself, although there are irrational beings who may choose this. Pain is the effect of causes, this is true whether of emotional, physical or mental sources.
[In 2016 I had a near death experience to which they are referring.] You chose to walk away from, not just an exit point, but the exit point. This was when the body was judged to have exceeded its limit. The body that you did create, albeit in a higher density, was built to handle a great deal of power, of energy. That required mass, it required a rational approach to lessons and karmas. It would burn out at some early point. In January of 2016 you apprehended what you describe as “quantum space.” Not only that but without fear you entered it and returned multiple times. This alone exceeded all your other plans in this life. The body had already become damaged and in March the exit was facilitated. But you, refused — stood up with your heart barely beating and said, “No.” We may override many at this point, but not our students. They have some latitude to create with us. However, the cost of this is a body that has been seriously burnt out. In your case joints fail, the circulatory system which is the main recipient of the by products of infinite energy, is failing. No amount of belief will get you out of the physical plane in the body you entered it with. And at that point pain is being created that is the result of plans and choices from both a different density and by you as the fragment.
If the comment “what you believe is what you create” is stepped down slightly, revised to be a question and qualified, you could have discussed “what is it that you believe that has led you to this point?” That would have been an invaluable conversation between two adepts. As it was, the broad statement offered no help, no information of practical use, it completely stopped discussion. Hence the frustration without clear awareness of why, on both sides.
[In the previously mentioned conversation with ____ I had wondered if universal truths could be karmic. As sometimes happens, they commented on this.]
We stop here for a cautionary point: Yes, your “truths” can be karmic because you are offering truths that resonate to the All That Is. If you take that on yourself you truly need “to read the room”. Particularly for younger souls, or the emotionally centered, the broad statement will read as judgment, as failure. It will create despair, surrender — regardless of the intention of the adept – you totter on the ragged edge of karmic interaction. How you use your truth is a choice you make and is not exempt from consequence at this level. This we say only to those who have come into this lifetime with a goal of recognizing Universal Truth in themselves. It matters not to any other path.
12/23/2025 Excerpt of Larger Session
K. Wait, dominion?
Answer: There are several transmission errors in the original work as given. We have explained before that polarities move from division to wholeness. All mutable overleaves reflect at the ordinal/cardinal level. Dominance is far more ordinal. It describes a one-on-one context. Dominion, as the King Level goal, describes better the need to form an empire and then curate every single aspect of it. Political campaigns do form little empires and one does not have to be the candidate to have dominion over the others.
K. So is Phil correct about the natural sequence of roles being Warrior, Slave, Artisan, Scholar, Sage, Priest, King?
Answer: Yes. All true spiritual systems will have internal balance and resonation. The original group were of generations which were imprinted strongly with a sense of vertical hierarchy. To them, the roles, the system of sevens, was rectilinear in terms of power. When in fact it should be viewed much as the akashic; a hub around which the roles rotate on the horizontal axis. Power is not key, but rather flow is. But for the original group, first was Slave and last was King and for them this was the vertical climb from no power to full power.
The nature of the Scholar as the incarnate “hub” of knowledge does come into play. Scholars are not simply passive accumulators of knowledge. Nor for that matter is the Akasha a library. Each in its way is collector of information that is relevant under the existing energetic construct. At some point, a scholar will be reshaping the data, taking universal truth as currently understood and then putting it into a form that will serve a future potential. Once that is achieved, the scholar will be seized by the need to act on this new form and offer it to others. The Akasha, of course, is working in time/space and therefore when it acts on the need to offer the new form of universal truth that is the shift in consciousness. This is the evolution of the Logos. Scholars however are simply presenting their final synthesis.
This is also the nature of the Infinite Souls. You have pondered on why the Infinite Souls would manifest in baby and young soul worlds. They choose their entry into the timeline in order to offer a clear view of Universal Truth – this moves potentialities up the timeline. This is what Scholars are doing right now; look around you. TS has his book in which he presents a new form of truth, he is therefore acting on the need to offer it. MH; all her collected knowledge has now moved actively into her consulting as the new form. All Old scholars still aware and participating are being driven by this need to offer the new form, each in accordance with their own energies and gifts.
K. [lost question]
Answer: This priest has to learn to say “No” with Love. At its core, this process is removing one’s energy from the equation, it is not necessarily rejection, but it is a firm no.
K. The last time I saw _____, I got this energy of struggle, like swimming against a fast current.
Answer: This fragment chose a body/mind vehicle for new wave energy that was predicted to arrive in 2012 on your timeline but ultimately was not able to fully manifest. This would have coincided with the end of her third internal monad and boosted her forward. She is so hardwired for the new wave that having to constantly navigate the old energy is very like standing on a ship in a stormy sea, every moment of pitch and roll is a desperate, existential attempt to find balance. This solstice marks the beginning of what appears to be a far more successful attempt at leaving old energy behind than was achieved in 2012. In the next year her imbalances should lessen, but she will need… [visually: something rather like a quaker meeting hall] …sitting in shared quiet, in a spare and simple environment. Many of the so called “autistics” have this same issue.
To create what one believes is the epitome of freedom for the perspective pursuing or considering this. I require no outer validation for this. No permission from another is needed for me to find wholeness in my way. I released my belief in the need for peer pressure, as a viable means to growth, long ago. It serves no one for me to judge or correct another by stating or implying that “if you don’t do it this way….” yada, yada, yada. I have nothing to prove to any other fragment, as there are endless paths which bring fragments back to a whole awareness. There is no “one” way to regain awareness of Self. There are as many ways as there are fragments.
This can be further examined through the use of channelling. I have no doubt that channelling can be a productive means to bring forward information. I also understand that all channelled material, or information, is specifically meant for the channeller. The channeller is the one who receives and interprets the energy. It is meant for them. If they choose to share this, I feel that it should be approached as one would view the diagnosis for another. I may be able to relate to certain aspects or “symptoms” of the one diagnosed, but to accept it verbatim for me, to apply to my self, would be folly. What we gather, we gather for our self. Any one proclaiming to have the one and only “way”, is projecting from ego. There’s nothing “wrong” about this either. We all go through the experiences which will provide us with the most value. Choosing to see another’s path as “wrong”, because it does not match the information we have received for ourselves, has the potential for very deep and profound realization. We do not need to agree to accept one another as part of same whole.
The experiences of our lives create a unique context through which we perceive our reality. I am not creating any other’s perspective/reality. Only my own. No other fragment can create that for me either, unless I allow them to. Letting others have that level of influence in the creation of my reality is a method which I no longer find value in, because then it is not my own. I am here to experience my own path. My own creation, not another’s, and belief is my means.
I am not sure this is the best place to ask this question and not certain it is related to the material presented here but RA said a good way to assist others is to have the attitude that all are one and different points of view are then equally valuable. If so, if I achieve that attitude how does this assist others? Do they feel that view from me energetically and they get the messsage to consider having that same attitude?
First — usually with Ra Material, you need the actual passage. Ra Material is so dense it requires, imo, to be read with higher self because it has to be unpacked. However, here is what I think is relevant to the question, to consider.
Part of 67.11:
A portion, seemingly, of the Creator rejoices at your choice to question us regarding the evolution of spirit. A seemingly separate portion would wish for multitudinous answers to a great range of queries of a specific nature. Another seemingly separate group of your peoples would wish this correspondence through this instrument to cease, feeling it to be of a negative nature.
Upon the many other planes of existence there are those whose every fiber rejoices at your service and those such as the entity of whom you have been speaking which wish only to terminate the life upon the third-density plane of this instrument. All are the Creator. There is one vast panoply of biases and distortions, colors and hues, in an unending pattern.
In the case of those with whom you, as entities and as a group, are not in resonance, you wish them love, light, peace, joy, and bid them well. No more than this can you do for your portion of the Creator is as it is and your experience and offering of experience, to be valuable, needs be more and more a perfect representation of who you truly are.
Could you, then, serve a negative entity by offering the instrument’s life? It is unlikely that you would find this a true service. Thus you may see in many cases the loving balance being achieved, the love being offered, light being sent, and the service of the service-to-self oriented entity gratefully acknowledged while being rejected as not being useful in your journey at this time. Thus you serve One Creator without paradox.
https://www.lawofone.info/search.php
There is another aspect of this, which points to non-adepts, so seekers. For instance, when mature souls tell me they are healers, I generally find that they are not happy with themselves and seek value in what they perceive as assisting others. I don’t point this out of course because they have to learn their lessons; the fact is though that no one heals anyone else. At best you can offer love and energy without attachment for the other self/higher-self to utilize if they choose to. This is because we cannot know what agreements, monads, karmas or lessons the other has to deal with that may manifest as dis-ease. To “Heal” then becomes coercive.
This relates to those we disagree with as well. I see them as infinite being, as the All, but I do not agree with them. I can though create comfort with my own presence, and be patient and listen and then off I go. I read somewhere that the kindness of old souls will stay with younger souls for many lifetimes until a day comes when that act is recalled to them and resonates in some way, however unknowing of the source. No action, thought or feeling of love is ever lost and though we can never know how that works out, it doesn’t matter.
Here’s my take on this.
I agree with Kath. Ra material is very dense. For instance, metaphorically, I would compare it to old English (5th or 6th century). If you only know modern English and read information written in old English, you may not translate the meaning, accurately, of the old English in a way that will be entirely comprehensible, into modern English. Though valid, it can be easy to misinterpret. It has become a kind of dogma, in its own right. There are “rules” to understanding it, in its original format.
You wrote, ”…if I achieve that attitude, how does this assist others? Do they feel that view from me energetically and they get the message to consider having that same attitude?”
How it assists others is, by you not interfering or being concerned about their conclusions. When we have reached a place where we accept wholeness, oneness, or “All are equal”, there is nothing for us to do, but be our self. You/I are a valuable, individual piece of the whole. Don’t make any conditions that others must see what you see, and therefore must interpret it the same way as you. What they feel, is what they feel. Making “how they feel” something you should be concerned about, defeats the point of being whole. Euphemistically, the carburetor doesn’t need to know what the brakes are doing, in order to be an effective carburetor. Simplistic analogy, I know, but it works. That act of being concerned, takes one away from the ability to be self.
True leadership is being the example, without condition. You know who you are. How any other reacts to that is irrelevant to the one Being. Leaders are not appointed. Leaders are recognized within. True leaders never use the term “leader”. They are, and others follow, if there is something of value for them to “become more than who they were before”. Stop concerning yourself with how others view “how you are being”, or the way you See. Just Be, and know that this is enough. It is what you are here to do, and the path of least resistance is by Being who you know your self to Be.
Bluntly, stop needing other people to agree with your interpretation, or finding the same value in what you know, or who you are. As much as this is about Oneness, it needs to be sought through the unique fragment that you are. Accept your self for who you know your self to be. Accept others for who they know themselves to be. Validation is not necessary. Feel who you are. Trust that. Know that. Share that. No other can define you.
I love this answer.
Just be me and let others be them and appreciate them as they are. (hopefully this is a reasonably accurate paraphrase).
It really is. It’s all about unconditional love.
So Mike’s question: …a good way to assist others is to have the attitude that all are one and different points of view are then equally valuable. If so, if I achieve that attitude how does this assist others? Do they feel that view from me energetically and they get the messsage to consider having that same attitude?
Ra Material deals with “polarization” a lot, service to self, service to others. It doesn’t really address soul age for instance. When the adept offers love and light to another fragment it isn’t done in order to depolarize the other, but only as a gesture of love/light of the sender as a part of the Creator. The “other” can accept or reject this gesture based on their own growth direction as an equal Creator. This is far more about you standing in the center of who you are or wish to be and creating that.
Two points from the prior comment Ra reply:
1.] …your experience and offering of experience, to be valuable, needs be more and more a perfect representation of who you truly are.
2.] …the service of the service-to-self oriented entity gratefully acknowledged
On one level you are assisting the other by seeing them as the creator equal to yourself, and on the next level offering an example of positivity love/light without attachment. This assists the whole of creation, one fragment to the other. Will they “get the message”? Yes/No/Doesn’t matter. [Personally I say “maybe” :-)]